07.06.2009 | Posted by Stacy Hillmer

Let’s talk about wearability

“Wearability” is a word I frequently hear when working with the staff of Bead&Button magazine, BeadStyle’s sister publication. In Bead&Button, beaders stitch together the tiniest of beads to create the biggest and boldest of jewelry. While many beaders enjoy this work for the sake of creating art and have no intention of ever wearing it, others want their efforts to have a practical outcome – a piece they have occasion to wear, a piece that flatters an outfit, a piece with wearability.

Strung jewelry, like the kind we publish in BeadStyle, is usually quite wearable in this sense, but wearability can have another equally important meaning: how well does this jewelry look and feel when worn? Does this multistrand bracelet drape well on the wrist? Does this pendant flip backwards when it bumps against the collarbone? Are these earrings too heavy to be comfortably (and safely) worn all day?

Just like I won’t wear ill-fitting clothing (contrary to the theory that owning smaller clothes will help you keep your weight down), I won’t wear a piece of jewelry that has wearability issues.

For instance, a few weeks back I blogged about this necklace that I made to wear to my brother’s wedding. Shortly after the blog, I wore the necklace around the office as a test drive. Wearability alert! The beautiful toggle clasp constantly flipped backwards and the coin beads did not lie flat but twisted and turned unattractively on the strand. I imagined myself at the wedding having to adjust the piece every time I was asked to be in a photo – annoying! Not my idea of a well-made design.

So I restrung it with two strands of faceted rounds. The double strands add more weight to the piece, making the toggle clasp stay put. And the round beads can twist and turn all they want and nobody will ever know.

Also, notice the spacers at the end of each strand – those are the product of another wearability discovery. When I restrung the necklace with just faceted rounds, the rounds at the ends of the strands bumped against each other, preventing a graceful convergence of the strands. I added small spacers to eliminate the “bump” factor.

The end result is a necklace that won’t require putzing during the wedding, a piece with wearability. To me, that’s totally worth the extra time, effort, and materials it took to restring. Plus, the lessons learned will help me make more wearable jewelry next time, and hopefully on the first try.

 



 

Comments

  • Peachtree said:

    Great topic!  I often see beautiful jewelry on the web and wonder about its 'wearability'.  At the very least, trying on your piece is a must.

    Alice

    July 7, 2009 5:00 PM
  • elizc said:

    Yes!  I totally know what you mean!!  In fact, I have found that those darn "coin" beads give me the most trouble!  I've made beautiful stuff that just twists and turns when worn.  So yes, I think  a "test drive" is a necessary part of creating jewelry.  I recently wore a bracelet that i'd made with a toggle clasp that was made of Tiger's Eye.  It was beautiful!  Well, before I even arrived at my destination, the bar on the toggle clasp just snapped in two.  I was SO glad that I did not sell it like that!  So now whenever I try a new type of clasp or material, I wear it to make sure it actually works!  

    July 7, 2009 11:15 PM
  • Vintajia said:

    Couldn't agree more! Its absolutely essential to wear your jewellery for a day to make sure it hands correctly and to eliminate any other problems - especially ends that you have missed that dig in.

    cheers

    Greer

    July 8, 2009 5:58 PM
  • Jane Konkel said:

    A putz-free design. I really like the new and improved version. Good detective work.

    July 9, 2009 1:33 PM
  • Stacy Hillmer said:

    I guess a good mantra for making jewelry might be "putz now or putz later." Either you take the time now to test drive your jewelry, troubleshoot, restring, and test drive again or else you (or your customers) will end up putzing with the piece later when wearing it. I'm so glad this is a topic near and dear to your hearts!

    July 10, 2009 12:44 PM
  • Hadassa said:

    I always insist that any recipient, paying or not, try on jewelry before she decides which item she wants - and that's after I've tested it. I agree with Liz. Twisting and turning is terribly frustrating. Various clasps have given me problems also. Opening and closing them several times before offering the item is a definite must! (P.S. I have a collection of BeadStyle booklets and I enjoy them very much. But I don't find the - OK sometimes a bit crazy - Bead&Button ideas any less wearable.)

    July 15, 2009 7:59 AM
  • auntieal said:

    I always try on jewelry for sale and often use my husband as a "model"  for a larger neck and longer torso. What on me can be perfect, on a taller woman, may not work at all. Also good idea to mix up sizes you sell, for bracelets too. A sixteen inch necklace and a 7 inch bracelet may be listed in books as the norm, but in reality they may be the exception.

    PS. Having a patient husband is a real help  :)

    July 28, 2009 11:21 AM
  • BeadStyle said:

    In her post last week about wearability , Stacy mentioned both comfort and safety. As a fan of stilettos

    July 28, 2009 3:05 PM

About Stacy Hillmer

You can read my blogs at both BeadAndButton.com and BeadStyleMag.com. To learn more about me, mouse over the "Magazines" tab and click "Our Staff."
Subscribers & Members

Become a Member

Register online for access to more valuable resource information.
Don't miss your connection to the reader forum, free projects, how to video, and more.

Not a Member?
Register  |  Why Join?

Subscriber & Member Log In

E-mail Address:
Password:
Remember me

Community Features

My Profile

Search Community

in

This Blog

Syndication

Copyright © 2009 Kalmbach Publishing Co.
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems